« Designer Babies? | Main | Where there is suffering ... »

Prenatal Testing for Down Syndrome

Earlier this mother the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommended that all pregnant women be offered screening for Down syndrome in their unborn babies. The announcement marks a major shift in "prenatal care" and illicited an understanble outcry among pro-lifers and groups that serve individuals with Down syndrome.

George Will, in his exceptional column George Will Golly, What Did Jon Do? explains:

The ACOG guidelines are formally neutral concerning what decisions parents should make on the basis of the information offered. But what is antiseptically called "screening" for Down syndrome is, much more often than not, a search-and-destroy mission: At least 85 percent of pregnancies in which Down syndrome is diagnosed are ended by abortions.

Barbara Curtis (MommyLife) posted a press release put out by the National Down Syndrome Congress:

The National Down Syndrome Congress (NDSC) condemns recent recommendations by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) that convey tacit approval for terminating pregnancies where the fetus has Down syndrome.

more

And, Candy Slice and RealChoice suggest the attack on kids with Down Syndrome through abortion will rise beyond its current outrageously high level.

I’ve summarized the recent events because of a letter I received from a good friend who has a wonderful child, a son, with Down Syndrome. He writes,

Is there an appropriate way to consider the prenatal testing that the medical society is pushing for? I’m regularly reading newspaper articles about how the medical community is demanding that all women’s babies be tested for things like Down Syndrome at a much earlier stage in the pregnancy—I think before 3 months. While I have nothing against the testing in itself because it could help prepare people for upcoming medical difficulties, the fact remains that people often are much more willing to abort the children when they know it has Downs. Under these circumstances, assuming that Christians do not abort and non-Christians often abort, I’m wondering if Christians will soon bear the brunt of higher insurance premiums since they will not abort and insist on taking the “risk” of having a medically challenged child. Worse yet, some weaker Christians may make the horrible mistake of aborting due to pressures put on them by the medical community when it is determined that they are pregnant w/ a Downs child and the “risk” level is much higher for the child.

In conclusion, while the prenatal testing issue is what caused me to write to you, my underlying concern is that prenatal testing should not be used to confuse or weaken the resolve of any Christian, strong or weak, to become the father or mother of a child w/ Downs Syndrome. To have such a child is a gift from God. A different gift to be sure and one that will probably require more patience, time and yes, even money. Maybe even more tears. For many Americans, such a gift sounds scary and certainly not fun. While I won’t say that being a father to a son w/ Downs has been without scary times, I will say this—if raised in a Christian home, a child w/ Downs will show his family a more complete meaning of love and devotion than they have ever imagined.

cross-posted: prolifeblogs

Posted by tim at January 29, 2007 12:48 PM

• Designer Babies? - Jan 09, 2007
• The Miracle of Life - Jun 13, 2006
• Not so graphic after all - Feb 14, 2006
• Embryo Images too Graphic for Newspaper - Feb 09, 2006
• Blogs4Life Conference! - Dec 16, 2005
• Susan Torres Gives Birth - Aug 03, 2005
• United Nations Population Fund May Receive U.S. Funding - Vote Set for Today - Jun 14, 2005
• Next time it will be easier (that's how it works) - Mar 31, 2005
• Terri Schindler Schiavo has just died - message from family - Mar 31, 2005
• Most Recent Report from The Hospital Bed: Terry Continues to Communicate - Mar 28, 2005

Comments

Posted by: Christina at January 29, 2007 2:12 PM