Home  |  About  |  Contact  |  Site map

« Vote 'Yes' on AZ Proposition 107 | Main | MSM Promotes the Democratic Party »

Arizona: October 27, 2006

The Bankrupt Tactics of Proposition 107 Opponents

Proposition 107 is about keeping marriage between one man and one woman. Opponents use red herrings, scare tactics, exaggerations and misinformation rather than take ownership of their extreme advocacy of gay marriage, a practice the majority of Arizonans oppose. Here’s one example - a sign I passed on my drive home:

gross_deception.jpg

You see, if prop 107 opponents were intellectually honest and displayed signs reflecting their fundamental disagreement with the traditional definition of marriage, they know support for the proposition would swell. As a result, they have to resort to highly deceptive messages they think will panic voters in their favor.

Arizona citizens who simply read the proposed constitutional amendment will not have a problem seeing through the smoke and mirrors presented by opponents of proposition 107.

Vote YES in favor of Proposition 107

Note that although signs like the one above are prevalent in the Phoenix area, I’ve yet to see one that actually opposes what the proposition will codify. Here's a sign created with the help of photoshop that reflects what opponents of Proposition 107 are actually saying (but don't what voters to see):

gross_deception3.jpg

And, websites opposing the proposition don’t even provide readers the intact language of the measure, which I’ve reproduced below.

AN INITIATIVE MEASURE
PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF
ARIZONA; AMENDING THE CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA;
BY ADDING ARTICLE XXX; RELATING TO THE PROTECTION
OF MARRIAGE
1. Be it enacted by the People of Arizona:
2. 1. Article: XXX. Constitution of Arizona is proposed to be added
3. as follows if approved by the voters and on proclamation of the Governor:
4. ARTICLE XXX. MARRIAGE
5. TO PRESERVE AND PROTECT MARRIAGE IN THIS
6. STATE, ONLY A UNION BETWEEN ONE MAN AND ONE
7. WOMAN SHALL BE VALID OR RECOGNIZED AS A
8. MARRIAGE BY THIS STATE OR ITS POLITICAL
9. SUBDIVISIONS AND NO LEGAL STATUS FOR UNMARRIED
10. PERSONS SHALL BE CREATED OR RECOGNIZED BY THIS
11. STATE OR ITS POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS THAT IS SIMILAR
12. TO THAT OF MARRIAGE.
13. 2. The Secretary of State shall submit this proposition to
14. the voters at the next general election as provided by article XXI,
15. Constitution of Arizona.
Voting in favor of the proposed amendment is an obvious choice for those who support traditional marriage. It reaffirms the definition of marriage in the Arizona Constitution and prohibits judges and politicians in Arizona from redefining it.

More information:

Center for Arizona Policy

Protect Marriage Arizona

Alliance Defense Fund

National Review: State Marriage Amendments Will Not Ban Private Contracts

Update: more propaganda exposed - AZTogether/No on Prop 107 violates campaign finance disclosure law

Posted by tim at October 27, 2006 10:32 PM




Articles Related to Arizona:

Comments

Doesn't it go both ways Tim? Why don't you send a clean proposition to the voters with that one issue, "Should homosexual couples be allowed to marry?" Even though it's already illegal.

No, it had to include provisions to penalize people living together. People that don't share your theocratic view of the world. Productive members of society that don't share your narrow view.

That sign is not off the mark, and watching Kyrsten Sinema debate Cathy Herrod on Horizon showed just that point.

Posted by: toc001 [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 30, 2006 12:12 PM




Categories


Recent Entries

Most Popular


    Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/blogicus/public_html/left.php on line 888


Subscribe

Add to Yahoo
Subscribe to MyMSN
Add to Newsgator
add to pluck
Subscribe in AOL
Add to Rojo
Subscribe in Bloglines
Subscribe to Feedster
Subscribe with Netvibes
Subscribe with Fusion
subscribe
Subscribe to NewsIsFree


Archives